| Raw | Protonorm |
|---|---|
| 0 | 2 or lower |
| 1 | 17 |
| 2 | 31 |
| 3 | 44 |
| 4 | 56 |
| 5 | 68 |
| 6 | 70 |
| 7 | 82 |
| 8 | 94 |
| 9 | 106 |
| 10 | 118 |
| 11 | 130 |
| 12 | 142 |
| 13 | 154 |
| 14 | 166 |
| 15 | 178 |
| 16 | 190 |
| 17 | 193 |
| 18 | 197 |
| 19 | 287 |
| 20 | 296 |
| 21 | 300 |
| 22 | 324 |
| 23 | 333 |
| 24 | 340 |
| 25 | 341 |
| 26 | 342 |
| 27 | 343 |
| 28 | 347 |
| 29 | 351 |
| 30 | 354 |
| 31 | 360 |
| 32 | 377 |
| 33 | 393 |
| 34 | 413 |
| 35 | 435 |
| 36 | 439 |
| 37 | 441 |
| 38 | 447 |
| 39 | 453 |
| 40 | 465 |
| 41 | 485 |
| 42 | 487 |
| 43 | 490 |
| 44 | 507 |
| 45 | 527 |
| 46 | 533 |
| 47 | 553 |
| 48 | 565 |
| 49 | 577 |
| 50 | 589 |
| 51 | 601 |
| 52 | 613 |
| 53 | 625 |
| 54 | 637 |
| 55 | 649 |
| 56 | 661 |
| 57 | 680 |
| 58 | 706 |
| 59 | 739 |
| 60 | 779 |
Used for norming are all of the known scores from tests correlating .69 or higher with the Genius Association Test (actually the upper nine from the table "Correlation with other tests" below). The used scores are if needed converted to protonorms using the relevant conversion formula or table. The raw scores on the Genius Association Test that form pairs with the used scores are rank-equated to the used scores, and where needed there is interpolation or extrapolation.
| 16 | * |
| 19 | *** |
| 21 | * |
| 22 | ** |
| 23 | * |
| 24 | * |
| 25 | * |
| 26 | * |
| 27 | *** |
| 28 | * |
| 31 | ****** |
| 32 | **** |
| 33 | *** |
| 34 | ****** |
| 35 | ** |
| 36 | ** |
| 37 | ** |
| 38 | **** |
| 39 | * |
| 40 | *** |
| 41 | ** |
| 42 | * |
| 43 | * |
| 44 | *** |
| 46 | * |
| 47 | **** |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Associative LIMIT Test | 18 | 0.95 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 6 | 0.91 |
| Odds | 6 | 0.91 |
| Short Test For Genius | 5 | 0.86 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 18 | 0.83 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #2 | 7 | 0.81 |
| KIT Intelligence Test | 7 | 0.73 |
| NVCPE | 11 | 0.70 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 9 | 0.69 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 18 | 0.69 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 20 | 0.69 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 6 | 0.68 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 20 | 0.66 |
| Long Test For Genius | 18 | 0.64 |
| The Final Test | 11 | 0.62 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 9 | 0.60 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 12 | 0.57 |
| International High IQ Society Verbal Test | 7 | 0.53 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 20 | 0.53 |
| Titan Test | 6 | 0.53 |
| Spatial Insight Test | 9 | 0.52 |
| The Final Test - Revision 2004 | 11 | 0.51 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 21 | 0.50 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 28 | 0.49 |
| Numbers | 12 | 0.47 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 24 | 0.43 |
| Reason | 9 | 0.39 |
| W87 | 5 | 0.35 |
| International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 10 | 0.33 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 20 | 0.30 |
| OCIP | 5 | 0.25 |
| Logima Strictica 36 | 7 | 0.24 |
| Mysterium Entrance Exam | 6 | 0.22 |
| Test of Shock and Awe | 13 | 0.19 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - C | 5 | 0.16 |
| Bonsai Test | 7 | 0.15 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version | 13 | 0.08 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 9 | 0.06 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 7 | 0.01 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 8 | -0.05 |
| SAT (old) | 5 | -0.43 |
| Mega Test | 5 | -0.44 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.495
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.70
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 5 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # scores | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 41.5 |
| United_Kingdom | 5 | 39.0 |
| United_States | 26 | 34.8 |
| Canada | 3 | 33.7 |
| Sweden | 6 | 29.7 |
| Finland | 2 | 27.5 |
| Norway | 2 | 27.0 |
| South_Africa | 2 | 23.0 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded averages.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Observed behaviour is good | 13 | 0.51 |
| PSIA True | 30 | 0.40 |
| Is resident of the European Union | 9 | 0.38 |
| PSIA Ethics factor | 45 | 0.35 |
| PSIA System factor (phased out) | 22 | 0.19 |
| Father's educational level | 50 | 0.17 |
| PSIA Deviance factor | 45 | 0.07 |
| PSIA Rational | 30 | 0.06 |
| Mother's educational level | 50 | 0.03 |
| PSIA Orderly | 30 | 0.02 |
| PSIA Extreme | 30 | 0.01 |
| Educational level | 52 | 0.01 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 52 | -0.02 |
| Is male | 60 | -0.03 |
| Disorders (own) | 52 | -0.09 |
| PSIA Rare | 30 | -0.14 |
| PSIA Aspergoid | 30 | -0.18 |
| PSIA Neurotic | 30 | -0.19 |
| PSIA Introverted | 30 | -0.24 |
| PSIA Cold | 30 | -0.26 |
| Year of birth | 57 | -0.35 |
| PSIA Antisocial | 30 | -0.41 |
| PSIA Cruel | 30 | -0.44 |
| GAIA - Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 7 | -0.56 |
| PSIA Just | 30 | -0.56 |
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| PSIA Deviance factor | 3 | 0.96 |
| PSIA Ethics factor | 3 | 0.94 |
| Educational level | 3 | 0.82 |
| PSIA System factor (phased out) | 3 | 0.43 |
| Father's educational level | 3 | 0.30 |
| Year of birth | 3 | -1.00 |
Correlation of this test with national average IQs published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Using the "split-half" method:
| Age group | # candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 55 to 59 | 5 | 33.6 |
| 50 to 54 | 6 | 37.7 |
| 45 to 49 | 12 | 37.5 |
| 40 to 44 | 4 | 38.5 |
| 35 to 39 | 6 | 31.8 |
| 30 to 34 | 7 | 30.0 |
| 25 to 29 | 8 | 35.3 |
| 22 to 24 | 3 | 25.3 |
| 20 or 21 | 1 | 37.0 |
| 18 or 19 | 4 | 29.3 |
| 16 | 2 | 25.5 |
| Year taken | # candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 9 | 37.3 |
| 2004 | 27 | 30.8 |
| 2005 | 14 | 34.9 |
| 2006 | 3 | 41.7 |
| 2007 | 5 | 30.6 |
| 2008 | 2 | 42.5 |
Correlation year taken vs average score = 0.33
n = 60
Item statistics are not published as that would help future candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from testees are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score (validity of the item in this test) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are removed or revised, resulting in a revised version of the test.
It can be said that two problems in this test are still unsolved, while the remaining 58 all have positive correlations with total score.