The scores so far (62 scores):
02*
04*
05*
12**
14*
15***
16*
17**
18**
20***
21***
22****
23**
24**
25****
26***
27**
28*
29**
31**
32***
33***
34**
36**
38****
39**
42*
45*
46*
47*
Correlation with other tests:
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Chimera Test | 4 | 0.99 |
| Test To End All Tests | 9 | 0.93 |
| Titan Test | 9 | 0.9 |
| Long Test For Genius | 16 | 0.88 |
| Sigma Test | 4 | 0.85 |
| OCIP | 5 | 0.84 |
| Analogies of LTFG | 18 | 0.8 |
| SAT (old) | 7 | 0.8 |
| CHART | 7 | 0.79 |
| Short Test For Genius | 15 | 0.79 |
| Mysterium Entrance Exam | 4 | 0.78 |
| Association Subtest of LTFG | 19 | 0.77 |
| Space, Time & Hyperspace | 21 | 0.77 |
| Mega Test | 17 | 0.71 |
| G-Test | 4 | 0.67 |
| Nemesis Test | 4 | 0.63 |
| Numbers | 13 | 0.61 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test | 11 | 0.6 |
| GRE | 7 | 0.42 |
| Logima Strictica 36 | 5 | 0.42 |
| Analogies #1 | 7 | 0.36 |
| Unknown tests | 9 | 0.29 |
| Miller Analogies | 8 | 0.15 |
| W87 | 13 | 0.15 |
| Evens | 5 | 0.05 |
| Encephalist-R | 4 | -0.02 |
| Opus | 4 | -0.07 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice | 8 | -0.14 |
| Power Test | 4 | -0.29 |
Mean correlation: 0.532
For norming, used are tests correlating .79 or higher. Raw and prior scores are arranged in two columns of numerical order, the highest raw score facing the highest prior IQ (prior scores are if needed converted to an IQ scale with 15 points per standard deviation), etc. For each raw score, the median of the IQs facing it is used to norm that score. Scores 48 to 52 are extrapolated.
| 0 | * |
| 2 | * |
| 4 | * |
| 5 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 10 | * |
| 11 | ** |
| 12 | *** |
| 14 | ** |
| 15 | *** |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | *** |
| 18 | ** |
| 20 | ***** |
| 21 | ***** |
| 22 | ***** |
| 23 | ** |
| 24 | ** |
| 25 | ******* |
| 26 | ******** |
| 27 | **** |
| 28 | **** |
| 29 | **** |
| 30 | * |
| 31 | ** |
| 32 | ****** |
| 33 | ***** |
| 34 | ** |
| 35 | ** |
| 36 | **** |
| 37 | ** |
| 38 | ***** |
| 39 | **** |
| 41 | *** |
| 42 | * |
| 44 | * |
| 45 | * |
| 46 | * |
| 47 | * |
| 48 | * |
n = 102
| 0 | * |
| 5 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 10 | * |
| 11 | * |
| 12 | ** |
| 14 | ** |
| 15 | *** |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | *** |
| 18 | ** |
| 20 | ***** |
| 21 | ***** |
| 22 | *** |
| 23 | ** |
| 24 | ** |
| 25 | ****** |
| 26 | ******** |
| 27 | **** |
| 28 | **** |
| 29 | **** |
| 30 | * |
| 31 | ** |
| 32 | ****** |
| 33 | ***** |
| 34 | ** |
| 35 | ** |
| 36 | **** |
| 37 | * |
| 38 | ***** |
| 39 | **** |
| 41 | *** |
| 42 | * |
| 44 | * |
| 45 | * |
| 46 | * |
| 47 | * |
| 48 | * |
n = 7
| 2 | * |
| 4 | * |
| 12 | * |
| 22 | ** |
| 25 | * |
| 37 | * |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Spatial Insight Test | 8 | 0.84 |
| Cartoons of Shock | 13 | 0.83 |
| Chimera High Ability Riddle Test | 8 | 0.81 |
| KIT Intelligence Test | 7 | 0.80 |
| Test of Shock and Awe | 16 | 0.77 |
| Long Test For Genius | 27 | 0.76 |
| Titan Test | 16 | 0.76 |
| Omega Contemplative Items Pool | 7 | 0.76 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius | 31 | 0.76 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 29 | 0.76 |
| Reason Behind Multiple-Choice | 9 | 0.74 |
| Scholastic Aptitude Test (old) | 10 | 0.74 |
| Short Test For Genius | 20 | 0.73 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius | 30 | 0.72 |
| Reason | 9 | 0.71 |
| G-test | 6 | 0.70 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 16 | 0.69 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #4 | 21 | 0.66 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 9 | 0.66 |
| The Nemesis Test | 11 | 0.65 |
| Ultra Test | 6 | 0.64 |
| Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 17 | 0.61 |
| Unknown tests | 13 | 0.61 |
| Cooijmans On-Line Test | 6 | 0.61 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #3 | 18 | 0.61 |
| Mega Test | 19 | 0.61 |
| Verbal section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 17 | 0.61 |
| Numbers | 22 | 0.60 |
| Analogies #1 | 12 | 0.60 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 38 | 0.60 |
| Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 11 | 0.59 |
| Lieshout International Mesospheric Intelligence Test | 13 | 0.54 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 2 | 9 | 0.53 |
| Sigma Test | 7 | 0.52 |
| Spatial section of Test For Genius - Revision 2004 | 17 | 0.52 |
| Genius Association Test | 23 | 0.50 |
| Bonsai Test | 12 | 0.46 |
| Culture Fair Numerical Spatial Examination - Final version | 11 | 0.39 |
| Associative LIMIT Test | 8 | 0.39 |
| Mysterium Entrance Exam | 11 | 0.37 |
| Logima Strictica 36 | 10 | 0.37 |
| International High IQ Society Miscellaneous tests | 8 | 0.34 |
| Isis Test | 8 | 0.32 |
| Graduate Record Examination | 10 | 0.30 |
| Miller Analogies Test (raw) | 10 | 0.25 |
| Qoymans Multiple-Choice #1 | 14 | 0.21 |
| Odds | 6 | 0.20 |
| International High IQ Society Verbal Test | 13 | 0.10 |
| 916 Test | 6 | 0.01 |
| Evens | 8 | -0.02 |
| Qoymans Automatic Test #1 | 6 | -0.17 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.584
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.76
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 6 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; Correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # Scores | Median score |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 39.5 |
| United_Kingdom | 7 | 39.0 |
| Israel | 2 | 34.0 |
| Canada | 5 | 32.0 |
| Belgium | 4 | 28.5 |
| Finland | 7 | 28.0 |
| Malta | 2 | 26.5 |
| United_States | 45 | 25.0 |
| Sweden | 3 | 24.0 |
| Australia | 4 | 23.5 |
| Brazil | 3 | 21.0 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1.0 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the medians, and then alphabetic.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Is resident of the European Union | 13 | 0.57 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 4 | 0.39 |
| Cattell Culture Fair | 7 | 0.39 |
| Observed associative horizon is wide | 13 | 0.37 |
| PSIA True | 19 | 0.34 |
| Observed behaviour is good | 23 | 0.34 |
| PSIA Ethics factor | 33 | 0.33 |
| PSIA Extreme | 19 | 0.26 |
| Is male | 109 | 0.24 |
| Year of birth | 103 | 0.19 |
| Mother's educational level | 44 | 0.18 |
| PSIA Orderly | 19 | 0.18 |
| Gifted Adult's Inventory of Aspergerisms | 13 | 0.17 |
| Father's educational level | 44 | 0.12 |
| W-87 | 14 | 0.07 |
| PSIA Rare | 19 | 0.05 |
| PSIA Cold | 19 | 0.02 |
| PSIA System factor (phased out) | 16 | 0.01 |
| PSIA Deviance factor | 33 | 0.01 |
| Educational level | 46 | -0.02 |
| Disorders (own) | 46 | -0.05 |
| PSIA Rational | 19 | -0.06 |
| Number of characters in candidate's name as registered | 110 | -0.08 |
| PSIA Neurotic | 19 | -0.09 |
| PSIA Antisocial | 19 | -0.09 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales | 8 | -0.10 |
| PSIA Introverted | 19 | -0.10 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (IQ) | 7 | -0.14 |
| PSIA Aspergoid | 19 | -0.19 |
| PSIA Cruel | 19 | -0.30 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 45 | -0.39 |
| PSIA Just | 19 | -0.47 |
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Year of birth | 7 | 0.49 |
| Number of characters in candidate's name as registered | 7 | -0.39 |
Correlation of this test with national average I.Q.s published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
| Age group | # Scores | Median score |
|---|---|---|
| 70 to 74 | 1 | 12.0 |
| 55 to 59 | 3 | 21.0 |
| 50 to 54 | 6 | 31.5 |
| 45 to 49 | 10 | 29.0 |
| 40 to 44 | 13 | 26.0 |
| 35 to 39 | 13 | 27.0 |
| 30 to 34 | 17 | 28.0 |
| 25 to 29 | 14 | 30.5 |
| 22 to 24 | 6 | 30.5 |
| 20 or 21 | 4 | 35.0 |
| 18 or 19 | 5 | 22.0 |
| 17 | 2 | 29.5 |
| 16 | 1 | 22.0 |
| 14 | 1 | 14.0 |
| Age group | # Scores | Median score |
|---|---|---|
| 70 to 74 | 1 | 12.0 |
| 55 to 59 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 50 to 54 | 1 | 37.0 |
| 45 to 49 | 1 | 25.0 |
| 40 to 44 | 2 | 12.0 |
| 35 to 39 | 1 | 22.0 |
| Year taken | # Candidates | Median score |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 4.0 |
| 1997 | 10 | 21.5 |
| 1998 | 3 | 15.0 |
| 1999 | 7 | 22.0 |
| 2000 | 14 | 27.5 |
| 2001 | 15 | 27.0 |
| 2002 | 9 | 24.0 |
| 2003 | 10 | 27.0 |
| 2004 | 18 | 30.5 |
| 2005 | 14 | 26.0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 24.0 |
| 2007 | 3 | 38.0 |
| 2008 | 4 | 28.5 |
Correlation year taken versus median score = 0.75
n = 110
Item statistics are not published as that would help future candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from candidates are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score (validity of the item in this test) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are removed or revised, resulting in a revised version of the test.