© Mar 2008 Paul Cooijmans
Remark: This was the verbal part of a French version of the Test For Genius. It has been taken out of use because there was very little interest in it, and because people would sometimes use it merely to compare it to the English version to gain some kind of advantage when taking the latter, without actually taking the French version itself. For the same reasons, the Netherlandic and German versions have been discontinued.
| Raw | Protonorm |
|---|---|
| 0 | 203 or lower |
| 1 | 231 |
| 2 | 254 |
| 3 | 272 |
| 4 | 285 |
| 5 | 293 |
| 6 | 302 |
| 7 | 329 |
| 8 | 331 |
| 9 | 333 |
| 10 | 335 |
| 11 | 337 |
| 12 | 339 |
| 13 | 341 |
| 14 | 343 |
| 15 | 345 |
| 16 | 367 |
| 17 | 393 |
| 18 | 394 |
| 19 | 397 |
| 20 | 400 |
| 21 | 403 |
| 22 | 407 |
| 23 | 408 |
| 24 | 409 |
| 25 | 410 |
| 26 | 411 |
| 27 | 412 |
| 28 | 413 |
| 29 | 440 |
| 30 | 453 |
| 31 | 458 |
| 32 | 513 |
| 33 | 517 |
| 34 | 521 |
| 35 | 525 |
| 36 | 533 |
| 37 | 541 |
| 38 | 548 |
| 39 | 556 |
| 40 | 564 |
| 41 | 571 |
| 42 | 578 |
| 43 | 586 |
| 44 | 593 |
| 45 | 601 |
| 46 | 608 |
| 47 | 615 |
| 48 | 623 |
| 49 | 631 |
| 50 | 638 |
| 51 | 646 |
| 52 | 654 |
| 53 | 661 |
| 54 | 668 |
| 55 | 676 |
| 56 | 683 |
| 57 | 691 |
| 58 | 698 |
| 59 | 705 |
| 60 | 713 |
| 61 | 721 |
| 62 | 728 |
| 63 | 736 |
| 64 | 744 |
| 65 | 751 |
| 66 | 759 |
| 67 | 772 |
| 68 | 790 |
| 69 | 813 |
| 70 | 841 |
Used for norming are all of the known scores from tests correlating 0.35 or higher with this test, except for the scores on the separate Association and Analogies sections of the French Test For Genius of which the present test is composed, as those sections do not have norms in their own right. The used scores are if needed converted to protonorms using the relevant conversion formula or table. The raw scores on this test that form pairs with the used scores are rank-equated to the used scores, and where needed there is interpolation or extrapolation.
| 6 | * |
| 16 | ** |
| 17 | * |
| 19 | * |
| 21 | * |
| 28 | * |
| 29 | * |
| 30 | * |
| 31 | * |
| 35 | * |
| 39 | * |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Short Test For Genius | 2 | 1.00 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 2 | 1.00 |
| OCIP | 2 | 1.00 |
| Sigma Test | 2 | 1.00 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius (French) | 11 | 0.96 |
| Long Test For Genius (French) | 10 | 0.94 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (French) | 11 | 0.93 |
| Numbers | 5 | 0.91 |
| Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 4 | 0.63 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 10 | 0.35 |
| Logima Strictica 36 | 2 | -1.00 |
| Mega Test | 2 | -1.00 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 2 | -1.00 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.658
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.81
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # scores | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 35.0 |
| France | 6 | 21.2 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded averages.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Father's educational level | 3 | 0.42 |
| Number of characters in candidate's name as registered | 12 | 0.33 |
| Year of birth | 12 | 0.05 |
| Is male | 12 | -0.13 |
| PSIA Ethics factor | 3 | -0.20 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 3 | -0.42 |
| PSIA Deviance factor | 3 | -0.98 |
| Mother's educational level | 3 | -1.00 |
Correlation of this test with national average IQs published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Using the "split-half" method:
Remark: These are separate statistics for the Association section
| 3 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 10 | ** |
| 11 | * |
| 13 | ** |
| 14 | * |
| 15 | * |
| 17 | * |
| 19 | * |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Logima Strictica 36 | 2 | 1.00 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 2 | 1.00 |
| Sigma Test | 2 | 1.00 |
| Association and Analogies (French) | 11 | 0.93 |
| Analogies of Long Test For Genius (French) | 11 | 0.79 |
| Long Test For Genius (French) | 10 | 0.79 |
| Numbers | 5 | 0.79 |
| Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 4 | 0.60 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 10 | 0.14 |
| Mega Test | 2 | -1.00 |
| Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (raw) | 2 | -1.00 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.600
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.77
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # scores | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 16.3 |
| France | 6 | 11.2 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded averages.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of characters in candidate's name as registered | 11 | 0.29 |
| Year of birth | 11 | -0.11 |
| Is male | 11 | -0.22 |
Correlation of this test with national average IQs published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Using the "split-half" method:
| Age group | # Candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 40 to 44 | 3 | 14.3 |
| 35 to 39 | 2 | 15.5 |
| 30 to 34 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 22 to 24 | 3 | 10.7 |
| Year taken | # Candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 10.0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 17.0 |
| 1998 | 2 | 11.5 |
| 2000 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 2003 | 4 | 11.5 |
| 2004 | 2 | 16.5 |
Correlation year taken vs average score = 0.12
n = 11
Remark: These are separate statistics for the Analogies section
| 3 | * |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 9 | * |
| 11 | * |
| 13 | * |
| 15 | * |
| 18 | ** |
| 20 | * |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Short Test For Genius | 2 | 1.00 |
| Strict Logic Sequences Exam I | 2 | 1.00 |
| Sigma Test | 2 | 1.00 |
| Association and Analogies (French) | 11 | 0.96 |
| Long Test For Genius (French) | 10 | 0.94 |
| Numbers | 5 | 0.90 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (French) | 11 | 0.79 |
| Nonverbal Cognitive Performance Examination | 4 | 0.56 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 10 | 0.47 |
| Logima Strictica 36 | 2 | -1.00 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.747
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.86
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 2 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # scores | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 18.7 |
| France | 6 | 10.0 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded averages.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Number of characters in candidate's name as registered | 11 | 0.25 |
| Year of birth | 11 | 0.04 |
| Is male | 11 | -0.09 |
Correlation of this test with national average IQs published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
Using the "split-half" method:
| Age group | # Candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 40 to 44 | 3 | 14.3 |
| 35 to 39 | 2 | 16.5 |
| 30 to 34 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 22 to 24 | 3 | 9.7 |
| Year taken | # Candidates | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 | 7.0 |
| 1997 | 1 | 18.0 |
| 1998 | 2 | 14.5 |
| 2000 | 1 | 3.0 |
| 2003 | 4 | 8.3 |
| 2004 | 2 | 17.5 |
Correlation year taken vs average score = 0.06
n = 11