This is the analogies subtest of the Netherlandic version of the Long Test For Genius, no longer in use. Currently only the English version of the Test For Genius (Revision 2004) is in use, to prevent candidates from comparing the different language versions to thus gain an advantage. Also, there was very little interest in the non-English versions.
The lack of interest is regrettable, since the problems of the Netherlandic verbal subtests, just as those of the nonverbal subtests, are of an exceptional quality. Some of them live on in the English TFG, and those that have no English versions are now revived in De Golfstroomtest.
| 3 | * |
| 7 | * |
| 10 | ** |
| 11 | * |
| 12 | ** |
| 13 | * |
| 14 | ** |
| 15 | *** |
| 19 | * |
| 21 | * |
| 22 | * |
| 26 | * |
| Test | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| De Laatste Test | 3 | 0.99 |
| Long Test For Genius (NL) | 16 | 0.92 |
| Drenth number series | 5 | 0.91 |
| Space, Time and Hyperspace | 17 | 0.87 |
| The Test To End All Tests | 3 | 0.83 |
| Short Test For Genius | 7 | 0.77 |
| Cooijmans Intelligence Test - Form 1 | 3 | 0.7 |
| Numbers | 12 | 0.69 |
| Association subtest of Long Test For Genius (NL) | 17 | 0.59 |
| Mega Test | 3 | 0.4 |
| Cattell Culture Fair | 9 | -0.01 |
| Hoeflin Power Test | 3 | -0.29 |
| Unknown tests | 3 | -0.33 |
Weighted average of correlations: 0.64
Conservatively estimated minimum g loading: 0.8
Ranking in above table is based on the unrounded correlations. All available data is present in this table, no tests are left out except for those with less than 3 score pairs. All known pairs are used to obtain the true, honest statistics; correlations are not artificially inflated by leaving out ceiling scores, outliers or other anomalies.
| Country | # scores | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 14 | 14.4 |
| Belgium | 2 | 11 |
For reasons of privacy, only countries with 2 or more candidates are included in this table. Ranking is based on the unrounded averages.
| Personalia | # | cor |
|---|---|---|
| Father's educational level | 5 | 0.7 |
| Educational level | 6 | 0.69 |
| PSIA Rational | 3 | 0.67 |
| PSIA Antisocial | 3 | 0.55 |
| Is male | 17 | 0.41 |
| PSIA Cruel | 3 | 0.35 |
| Mother's educational level | 6 | 0.3 |
| PSIA Cold | 3 | 0.21 |
| Is resident of the European Union | 3 | -0.08 |
| PSIA Rare | 3 | -0.25 |
| PSIA Neurotic | 3 | -0.35 |
| PSIA Just | 3 | -0.39 |
| Disorders (own) | 6 | -0.4 |
| Disorders (parents and siblings) | 6 | -0.4 |
| PSIA Introverted | 3 | -0.5 |
| PSIA Ethics factor | 4 | -0.63 |
| Year of birth | 8 | -0.65 |
| PSIA True | 3 | -0.73 |
| PSIA Aspergoid | 3 | -0.78 |
| PSIA Extreme | 3 | -0.83 |
| PSIA Deviance factor | 4 | -0.9 |
| PSIA Orderly | 3 | -0.9 |
Correlation of this test with national average IQs published by Lynn and Vanhanen:
| Age group | # testees | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 40 to 44 | 2 | 13 |
| 35 to 39 | 4 | 18.8 |
| 30 to 34 | 3 | 13.7 |
| 25 to 29 | 6 | 14.5 |
| 22 to 24 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 or 19 | 1 | 7 |
| Year taken | # testees | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 5 | 14.8 |
| 1997 | 2 | 7.5 |
| 1999 | 3 | 15.7 |
| 2000 | 1 | 19 |
| 2001 | 1 | 15 |
| 2002 | 1 | 7 |
| 2004 | 3 | 16.7 |
| 2005 | 1 | 12 |
Correlation year taken vs average score = 0.05
n = 17
Using the "split-half" method:
Item statistics are not published as that would help future candidates. To detect bad items, answers and comments from testees are studied, as well as, for each problem, the correlation with total score (validity of the item in this test) and the proportion of candidates getting it wrong (hardness of the item). Possible bad items are removed or revised, resulting in a revised version of the test.
Most of this report was generated by software created 2002-present by Paul Cooijmans.